- The Road Out of Town
-

isibeau
- October 14th, 2009
Here in town there is a seemingly innocuous plan to convert the surface of a couple of the local playing fields from regular sod to the new and improved, long-life grastroturf.
I'm not a fan of kids playing on astroturf, I see organizations who install astroturf as a end-all solution with out the proper maintainence, overhaul, resulting in worn padding and damage to children's feet, knees and hips. Plus there is a healthy social development in having kids come home so filthy from playing in the mud while playing soccer you have to wrap them up in a 33gal Hefty Trash bag up to their armpits in order to even get them in the car.
I see the mass transfer to turf fields as a continuation of the increasing inability of Americans to plan more than 5 years in advance. Here in this area, the county adopted a population expantion plan, called the Growth Management Act. It was passed almost 20 years ago, and was designed to be maleable, to be reviewed and revisited every 5 years to assess it's effecacy and accuracy in managing urban to suburban to rural sprawl. It went so far as to dictate zoning for everything, housing, retail, and of course parks. On the whole, I see the transformation of playing fields to turf as a cheap shadow to the true intention of the GMA... Parks department is more than 15 years behind in the creation of usable open space for children, families and the community as a whole to use for recreation, whether that be for a family picnic or local rec sports team.
So fast forward to the present, and the current debate of the local sports field. It is so overused in the lack of adequate playing space, that unfortunately the switch to turf is the best option at this point. Either this or continually spend hundreds of thousands of dollars yearly on repair and maintainence, or put the grastroturf in and hope that the future residents have the wherewithall to realize that the replacement and maintainence in the longrun will also be costly and time conusming.
So, the city votes on the proposal, it's approved and the funds allocated, you would think that would be the end, but you'd be wrong. There is a citizen's pannel who has dug up a 10 year old study on 20 year old astroturf fields, showing the rubber shavings and the coloring of the turf are carcinogenic and that the money is being wasted by puting in astroturf that could make our children sick! Now... we're supposed to blindly fall prey to his fearmongering, using our children as pawns, and go to city hall with torches and pitchforks, presumably to strong arm city council into seeing the light. Nevermind the age of the study and the age of the astroturf that was being examined, and the fact that the new grastroturf is not made of those carcinogenic agents or any others. This ringleader of the fight against the turf fields is the same leader of a small citizens' coalition who wanted to originally, a year ago, to divert the earmarked monies from the playing fields to road improvement.
So, it struck me as odd, the other day... thinking about what kind of statement that makes. If you think about it, he wants to not improve the parks, places to build communities, for families to get together and interract, for children to grow and learn how to play together, learn how to support a team and family and engender a sense of greater communinty. Instead he wants to improve the roads. Improve the roads, allow the fields to deteriourate, allow the sense of community and gathering wither and die, and instead of giving people a reason to stay, he wants to allow them greater access to leave. Give the public and residents greater access to leave and take their sense of community and extended family far away, so that he can have the entire pie to himself, and not have to bother with those pesky kids and thier families and sense of community.